
Federal Sentencing and Post-Conviction Law Firm
Habeas corpus 2255 and 2241 petitions
The motion to vacate, set aside or correct a sentence provided by 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is a modern descendant of the common law petition for a writ of habeas corpus. It is available only to people convicted in federal courts who are in custody. Who is "in custody" is a complicated question – but it is not limited to people in prison. For example, people on supervised release are "in custody." The § 2255 motion is the postconviction tool most federal prisoners turn to after they have exhausted their appeals. When it is used effectively, it can be a powerful tool to right injustices that were not or could not have been raised on direct appeal. This is because it gives courts broad discretion in fashioning appropriate relief, including dismissal of all charges and release of the prisoner, retrial, or resentencing.
Occasionally, the remedy provided by § 2255 will be “inadequate or ineffective to test the legality of [a prisoner's] detention.” 28 U.S.C. § 2255. In those rare instances, federal prisoners may petition for traditional writs of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. § 2241 petitions can also be used to challenge the conditions of confinement in a Bureau of Prisons’ facility, improper calculation of a sentence; good conduct time and jail credit; disciplinary matters, inadequate medical care; and other problems.
One of the most significant differences between a direct appeal and a § 2255 motion is that direct appeals are decided based on the district court record as it exists at the time the notice of appeal is filed. In contrast, § 2255 motions offer defendants the opportunity to present the court with new evidence. While issues which may be raised in a § 2255 motion are not limited by the record as it exists at the time the motion is filed, unlike in a direct appeal, not all issues may be raised in a § 2255 motion. Section 2255 motions may only be used to raise jurisdictional, constitutional, or other fundamental errors. A § 2255 motion is always the proper vehicle to question whether a defendant was deprived of his or her Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel at trial, plea, sentencing, or on direct appeal.
The Law Offices of Alan Ellis specializes in representing federal criminal defendants in plea negotiations, sentencing representation and consultation, Rule 35, prison designation, transfers, disciplinary matters and other problems, direct criminal appeals, Section 2255 motions, habeas corpus petitions and other post conviction remedies, Supreme Court practice, parole representation, and international prisoner treaty transfer work for foreign inmates and Americans arrested abroad. The firm regularly files § 2255 motions on behalf of its clients. In the rare case that a § 2255 motion is "inadequate or ineffective to test the legality of [a prisoner's] detention," the firm has also filed petitions for § 2241 writs of habeas corpus on behalf of its clients. If you are interested in exploring a § 2255 motion or habeas petition as an option for yourself or a loved one, contact the Law Offices of Alan Ellis.
Click here to read "A 2255 and 2241 Primer: A Guide For Clients And The Family And Friends."
For more information about section 2255 motions, habeas corpus petitions and other post conviction remedies please contact the Law Offices of Alan Ellis.
With offices in San Francisco, California (Mill Valley), and Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (Ardmore), and soon in China, the Law Offices of Alan Ellis provides a full range of sentencing and post- conviction services to lawyers and defendants throughout the United States and internationally, including California (such as Los Angeles, San Francisco, San Jose, San Diego, and Sacramento), New York (such as New York City), Florida (such as Miami, Tampa, and Orlando), Texas (such as Dallas, Houston, and San Antonio), Illinois (such as Chicago), Pennsylvania (such as Philadelphia and Pittsburgh), Ohio (such as Cleveland, Columbus, and Cincinnati), Michigan (such as Detroit and Grand Rapids), Georgia (such as Atlanta and Savannah), and North Carolina (such as Charlotte and Raleigh). Regardless of your location, we are available to help you. Indeed, we have practiced in federal courts in 47 of the 50 states. We are available to assist you and your attorney in obtaining the lowest possible sentence, and if it's one of incarceration, to be served at the best place possible under terms and conditions that will you to be released from custody at the earliest possible opportunity.
|